![]() ![]() Time efficiency was the most often defined outcome ( n = 12/75%), followed by precision ( n = 11/69%) and patient satisfaction ( n = 5/31%). Almost two-thirds of the studies focused on implant therapy. A total of 440 patients with 658 restorations were analyzed. Of the 394 titles retrieved by the search, 42 abstracts were identified, and subsequently, 16 studies were included for data extraction. ![]() English-language literature consistent with the original review published between 16 September 2016 and 31 October 2022 was considered. A systematic search of PubMed/Embase using PICO criteria was performed. Here, we aim to update this work and summarize the recent scientific literature reporting complete digital workflows and to deduce clinical recommendations. ![]() In 2017, a systematic review reported on complete digital workflows for treatment with tooth-borne or implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Digital applications have changed therapy in prosthodontics. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |